Screenshot of Google's John Mueller discussing reasons for ranking changes

Can We Know When SEO Causes Ranking Adjustments?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp

Get Stunning Website in just 30 days

Services on: Website Design & Development | Website revamp | SEO | Social Media Optimization | Digital Marketing 

A curious factor occurred in the newest Google Workplace Hours Hangout. Two folks reported doing one thing and their search rankings dropped. Each folks undid the adjustments and their rankings returned. It seemed like trigger and impact however Google’s Mueller stated it was not.

These unrelated occasions mentioned in the identical workplace hours hangout with John Mueller means that understanding why one thing ranks or doesn’t rank is extra advanced than what is definitely observable.

Are Actions Adopted by Ranking Adjustments Causally Associated?

Causally Associated means when an motion causes a response, the place there’s an precise trigger and impact relationship.

In SEO a hyperlink builder might construct hyperlinks and ideally rankings enhance. Fairly easy, proper?

What occurred within the Google workplace hours hangout means that the perceived causal relationship shouldn’t be that easy.

Above the Fold Content material and Ranking Adjustments

Final week a writer requested if Google gave choice to websites with above the fold content material. They requested as a result of a competitor moved the placement of their content material and afterward skilled a dramatic enchancment in rankings.

Google’s John Mueller Answering Ranking Change Query

Screenshot of Google's John Mueller discussing reasons for ranking changesGoogle’s John Mueller answering query about adjustments in rating

John Mueller stated that the place of the content material above the fold shouldn’t be a robust choice.

The writer went forward anyway and up to date their web site to point out extra content material above the fold and their rankings dropped.

This week he returned to share to ask if the design change to push content material above the fold triggered the drop in rating.

Google Adverts and Perceived Affect on Rankings

In the identical Google Workplace Hours hangout this week, another person stated that the second they began a Google Adverts marketing campaign their web site rankings disappeared from the search engine outcomes pages (SERPs).

They subsequent recounted that after they stopped the Google Adverts marketing campaign the positioning returned to the SERPs and was rating the identical as earlier than (Quotation: Rankings Collapsed After Shopping for Google Adverts?).

John Mueller’s response to each instances was to notice that the rating adjustments had been unrelated to the perceived causes of these adjustments.

In different phrases, there was no causal relationship between the 2 occasions (an motion and the rating adjustments).

How Can One Know that Google Responded to a Change?

Each rating associated occasions elevate the chance that one can not know with certainty {that a} explicit exercise is answerable for a change in rankings.

We see this in hyperlink constructing the place hyperlinks are created and rankings enhance. However generally nothing occurs then three months later the rankings enhance.

In each instances everybody agrees it was the hyperlinks. However was it?

Apophenia – Why People See Patterns

It seems that the human mind is wired to see patterns. It’s stated to be a survival mechanism that favors those that can see patterns even after they don’t exist as a result of in nature it might show deadly to miss out on a sample the place a sample exists.

This tendency to see patterns even the place none exist is named, apophenia.

According to Psychology Today:

“Our brains are pattern-detection machines that connect the dots, making it possible to uncover meaningful relationships among the barrage of sensory input we face.

Without such meaning-making, we would be unable to make predictions about survival and reproduction. The natural and interpersonal world around us would be too chaotic.

So, when our pattern-recognition systems misfire, they tend to err on the side of caution and self-deception.”

Competitor Up to date Content material and Rankings Improved

Within the workplace hours hangout from the earlier week a writer informed John Mueller {that a} competitor up to date their web site to maneuver their content material above the fold and had skilled a dramatic enchancment in rankings.

They noticed the replace to the web site and the following enchancment in rankings and acknowledged a transparent sample. In order that they requested John Mueller if Google gave choice to pages with extra content material above the fold. (Quotation: Does Google Offers Choice to Content material Above the Fold?).

John Mueller answered that Google didn’t have a robust choice for pages with content material above the fold.

“I don’t think we have strong preferences in that regard.”

Apparently the writer was not satisfied as a result of they up to date their net web page to focus extra content material above the fold.

What occurred subsequent stunned the writer. Their net web page dropped from the highest primary place to the second place.

Did Content material Above the Fold Trigger Loss in Rankings?

The writer, clearly seeing that the competitor had a bonus sought to shut that benefit by pushing their very own content material nearer to the highest of the web page.

What they did was to take away a picture banner from above the fold. After doing eradicating the banner and bettering their net web page their key phrase dropped from the primary place to  quantity two.

As an alternative of solidifying their rankings the net web page misplaced rating place.

So now the writer was again on the Google workplace hours hangout asking if the change they made is answerable for the drop in rankings.

Mueller responded that the adjustments that had been made aren’t notably dramatic sufficient to trigger the noticed change in rankings.

He stated:

“I think if you make that kind of design change on your website, where suddenly the content moves up or suddenly the content moves down, you would generally see that as a fairly soft change, like a very small change.

…I don’t think you would be able to… tie it back to that change.”

When informed that the change in rankings was from place one to place two, Mueller reaffirmed that the rating drop was not tied to the design adjustments and that what was seen was simply regular each day rating adjustments.

Mueller stated:

“That feels like… a subtle, normal change in search that can always happen, that a site moves from position one to position two or position three and then to position two and then position one.

These kinds of changes are fairly common.”

Google’s Algorithm is a Black Field

The reality is that no person can really know, with certainty, that one thing that was carried out had an impact on Google’s algorithms.

In computing, a black field could be an algorithm whose inputs and outputs could be seen however how these inputs had been processed and the way the outputs had been computed aren’t seen.

Google’s algorithm is this sort of a black field. These exterior of Google can not see or know what is occurring within the field.

We can put hyperlinks and content material into the black field and see the rankings come out on the opposite finish. However since we are able to’t see what occurred contained in the black field which means we can’t know why the positioning is rating the place it does.

SEO Can not Be Definitively Attributed to Outcomes

By not understanding what occurred contained in the field we actually have no idea if the hyperlinks did the trick, if among the hyperlinks helped the net web page rank or if not one of the hyperlinks and the rankings had been the results of the content material alone.

It’s a proven fact that how the hyperlinks and content material influenced these rankings can’t be identified by those that have no idea how the black field operates. This can be a truth.

The implication of that is broad ranging. For instance, we completely can not extract the anchor textual content to model identify anchor textual content ratios and assign a that means to that ratio.

Some folks will observe that in a research of hundreds of thousands of websites the highest ranked websites shared XYZ anchor textual content ratios and prescribe these because the statistically “natural” distribution of anchor textual content.

And whereas that’s a statistical distribution of anchor textual content perceived to be the conventional ratio, there’s nothing in that statistic which means that is what contributed to their high ranked standing as a result of we don’t know what occurred contained in the black field.

There’s actually no causal relationship between the inputs we observe stepping into and the outputs noticed popping out. We are solely seeing patterns that our brains are wired as much as see.

We see the patterns that our brains mechanically sew collectively in significant methods.

There are various features of SEO that exist as a result of our brains see patterns that don’t essentially have a causal relationship.

In my view, it could open up a brand new approach of seeing SEO if we as an business turned extra self privy to our pure tendency to see patterns the place they might not exist.

Doing this may occasionally assist us to maneuver past observing the apparent and develop into extra open to entertaining different causes for the outputs we see popping out of Google’s black field algorithm.


Eradicating a Banner to Push Content material Up Triggered a Drop in Ranking
Watch it on the 12:36 minute mark


#SEO #Ranking

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp


Chennai's Best Website Design & Development hub. We create Professional stunning WordPress websites and doing Digital Marketing to scale up your business.

Latest Articles

Happy to help you